HR 1: Appropriations, Tax Law Amendments, and Unemployment Benefit Amendments ("Stimulus Bill") (2009)
Bill Summary:
HR 1: Making supplemental appropriations for job preservation and creation, infrastructure investment, energy efficiency and science, assistance to the unemployed, and State and local fiscal stabilization, for fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes.
House Votes On This Bill
Date
Stage
Yea
Nay
Arcuri's Vote
2009-02-13
Conference Report Vote
246
183
Yea
2009-01-28
Passage
244
188
Yea
2009-01-26
Introduced
S J Res 5: Releasing Funds for Economic Stabilization Act (2009)
Bill Summary:
SJ Res 5: A joint resolution relating to the disapproval of obligations under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.
House Votes On This Bill
Date
Stage
Yea
Nay
Arcuri's Vote
S Amdt 109: Hollywood Productions Tax Credit (2009)
Bill Summary:
S Amdt 109 to S Amdt 98 to HR 1: To strike the $246 million tax earmark for Hollywood production companies.
House Votes On This Bill
Date
Stage
Yea
Nay
Arcuri's Vote
HR 1105: 2009 Budget Bill (2009)
Bill Summary:
HR 1105: Making omnibus appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes.
House Votes On This Bill
Date
Stage
Yea
Nay
Arcuri's Vote
2009-02-26
Passage
245
178
Yea
2009-02-23
Introduced
HR 1586: Aid To States for Medicaid, Teacher Employment, and Other Purposes (2010)
Bill Summary:
House Votes On This Bill
Date
Stage
Yea
Nay
Arcuri's Vote
2010-08-10
Concurrence Vote
247
161
Yea
2010-03-25
Concurrence Vote With Amendment
276
145
2009-03-19
Passage
328
93
Yea
2009-03-18
Introduced
HR 146: Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (2009)
Bill Summary:
HR 146: An act to designate certain land as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System, to authorize certain programs and activities in the Department of the Interior and the Department of Agriculture, and for other purposes.
House Votes On This Bill
Date
Stage
Yea
Nay
Arcuri's Vote
2009-03-25
Concurrence Vote
285
140
Yea
2009-03-03
Passage
394
13
2009-01-06
Introduced
S Amdt 739: Public Debt Amendment (2009)
Bill Summary:
S Amdt 739 to S Con Res 13: To prohibit the consideration of any budget resolution, or amendment thereto, or conference report thereon, that shows an increase in the public debt, for the period of the current fiscal year through the next 10 years, equal to or greater than the debt accumulated from 1789 to January 20, 2009.
House Votes On This Bill
Date
Stage
Yea
Nay
Arcuri's Vote
HR 1913: Hate Crimes Expansion (2009)
Bill Summary:
HR 1913: To provide Federal assistance to States, local jurisdictions, and Indian tribes to prosecute hate crimes, and for other purposes.
House Votes On This Bill
Date
Stage
Yea
Nay
Arcuri's Vote
2009-04-29
Passage
249
175
Yea
2009-04-02
Introduced
S Amdt 1067: Allowing Loaded Guns in National Parks (2009)
Bill Summary:
S Amdt 1067 to S Amdt 1058 to HR 627: To protect innocent Americans from violent crime in national parks and refuges.
House Votes On This Bill
Date
Stage
Yea
Nay
Arcuri's Vote
HR 2751: Trade-in Vouchers for Fuel Efficient Cars (2009)
Bill Summary:
HR 2751: To accelerate motor fuel savings nationwide and provide incentives to registered owners of high polluting automobiles to replace such automobiles with new fuel efficient and less polluting automobiles.
House Votes On This Bill
Date
Stage
Yea
Nay
Arcuri's Vote
2009-06-09
Passage
298
119
Yea
2009-06-08
Introduced
Co-sponsor
S Amdt 1399: Requiring Completion of Reinforced Border Fencing (2009)
Bill Summary:
S Amdt 1399 to S Amdt 1373 to HR 2892: To require the completion of at least 700 miles of reinforced fencing along the southwest border by December 31, 2010.
House Votes On This Bill
Date
Stage
Yea
Nay
Arcuri's Vote
HR 3435: Supplemental Appropriations for the "Cash for Clunkers" Program (2009)
Bill Summary:
HR 3435: AN ACT making supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2009 for the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Program.
House Votes On This Bill
Date
Stage
Yea
Nay
Arcuri's Vote
2009-07-31
Introduced
2009-07-31
Passage
316
109
Yea
HR 4213: Unemployment Benefits Extension and Tax Law Amendments (2010)
Bill Summary:
House Votes On This Bill
Date
Stage
Yea
Nay
Arcuri's Vote
2010-07-22
Concurrence Vote
272
152
Yea
2010-05-28
Concurrence Vote
245
171
2010-05-28
Concurrence Vote With Amendment
215
204
Yea
2009-12-09
Passage
241
181
2009-12-07
Introduced
READ REVIEWS
Posted by: Shirley Eadline
Posted: 2009-09-15
Mr Arcuri is the "leader of the pack" in Upstate NY which believes that control is best gained and maintained through intimidation, nepotism and financial purchase. Their arrogance has finally reached the tipping point and the constituents are ready to fight to regain control the political process.
Posted by: Juan Martinez
Posted: 2009-11-03
I wonder how many favors Arcuri performed in order to get the support needed to run for congress. Remember that female politician who got pulled over for drunk driving in Utica when Arcuri was DA, then phoned Arcuri and he convinced the cops to back off? I don't think the O-D printed a follow-up to that story.
Why is it that Arcuri supported modification of the clean energy bill to allow dirty coal plants to continue to be dirty? As a representative of upstate NY, he should know about the problems we have with acid rain and the lakes that are dead or dying because of it. He claims it was to save jobs in NY, but he didn't say how many or what kinds. Clean energy is intended to create jobs. Most of our electricity comes from hydro power, so why is Arcuri favoring dirty coal plants?
Arcuri doesn't think the FCC should be allowed to enforce network neutrality on the Internet. What? Network neutrality was one of the founding principles of the Internet, and it allowed the Internet to grow as quickly as it did. Now the big players want to make more money off it by doing away with network neutrality, even though they are already making enough money. Arcuri says he doesn't support network neutrality because it prevents broadband Internet access from spreading out to rural areas. This is the excuse the big players use, and it is false. Why is Arcuri listening to the companies that have the most to gain from the loss of network neutrality? The number of Internet providers has shrunk considerably over the last ten years, and now the big players want to make sure they are able to shut out the few smaller players that are left.
I haven't heard Arcuri's opinion on the public option for health care. Does that mean he is going to vote against it? The companies who stand to lose the most are the ones who are spending the largest amount of money to convince our elected representatives to vote against US. The public option is a KEY factor that will introduce competition and force out of hand health care costs to become more affordable for everyone. Do away with the public option, and say goodbye to affordable healthcare and real healthcare reform. I hear Republicans trying to shock the public by saying that the public option will cost 1.2 trillion dollars over ten years, and I say it's worth the investment. We've already spent more than 1.2 trillion dollars in much less time bailing out crooks who ripped us off to begin with, so why don't we the people get a chance to see some relief for a change? Give us lower health care costs, and we will have more money to spend on other things, boosting the rest of the economy. It isn't rocket science.
Posted by: Juan Martinez
Posted: 2009-11-03
I wonder how many favors Arcuri performed in order to get the support needed to run for congress. Remember that female politician who got pulled over for drunk driving in Utica when Arcuri was DA, then phoned Arcuri and he convinced the cops to back off? I don't think the O-D printed a follow-up to that story.
Why is it that Arcuri supported modification of the clean energy bill to allow dirty coal plants to continue to be dirty? As a representative of upstate NY, he should know about the problems we have with acid rain and the lakes that are dead or dying because of it. He claims it was to save jobs in NY, but he didn't say how many or what kinds. Clean energy is intended to create jobs. Most of our electricity comes from hydro power, so why is Arcuri favoring dirty coal plants?
Arcuri doesn't think the FCC should be allowed to enforce network neutrality on the Internet. What? Network neutrality was one of the founding principles of the Internet, and it allowed the Internet to grow as quickly as it did. Now the big players want to make more money off it by doing away with network neutrality, even though they are already making enough money. Arcuri says he doesn't support network neutrality because it prevents broadband Internet access from spreading out to rural areas. This is the excuse the big players use, and it is false. Why is Arcuri listening to the companies that have the most to gain from the loss of network neutrality? The number of Internet providers has shrunk considerably over the last ten years, and now the big players want to make sure they are able to shut out the few smaller players that are left.
I haven't heard Arcuri's opinion on the public option for health care. Does that mean he is going to vote against it? The companies who stand to lose the most are the ones who are spending the largest amount of money to convince our elected representatives to vote against US. The public option is a KEY factor that will introduce competition and force out of hand health care costs to become more affordable for everyone. Do away with the public option, and say goodbye to affordable healthcare and real healthcare reform. I hear Republicans trying to shock the public by saying that the public option will cost 1.2 trillion dollars over ten years, and I say it's worth the investment. We've already spent more than 1.2 trillion dollars in much less time bailing out crooks who ripped us off to begin with, so why don't we the people get a chance to see some relief for a change? Give us lower health care costs, and we will have more money to spend on other things, boosting the rest of the economy. It isn't rocket science.
