Political Voting Records: Texas-TX, Hutchison: Federal, State, and Local Relations

HOME: Politicians >> Texas-TX >> Hutchison >> Federal, State, and Local Relations

Voting Record for Hutchison of Texas-TX
Voting Record on Legislation that Involves Federal, State, and Local Relations

Senate

Kay Hutchison
U.S. Senate: Senator
Republican Next Election Year: 2012

Education:
JD, University of Texas School of Law, 1967 BA, University of Texas, 1962

Profession:
Co-Author, Nine and Counting: The Women of the Senate, 2000 Co-Founder, Fidelity National Bank of Dallas Political/Legal Correspondent, Kotton Port Rail Center Television, Houston Owner, McCraw Candies Incorporated Senior Vice-President/General Counsel, Republic Bank Corporation Author Attorney

Overall
Politican Rating

Based on 2 reviews

View Hutchison's Voting Record Under These Categories
Abortion Issues Agriculture Issues Animal Rights and Wildlife Issues Budget, Spending and Taxes Business and Consumers Campaign Finance and Election Issues Civil Liberties and Civil Rights Congressional and Legislative Affairs Crime Issues Defense Drug Issues Education	Employment and Affirmative Action Energy Issues Environmental Issues Executive Branch Family and Children Issues Federal, State, and Local Relations Foreign Aid and Policy Issues Gambling and Gaming Government Reform Gun Issues Health Issues Housing and Property Issues Immigration	Indigenous Peoples Labor Legal Issues Military Issues National Security Issues Reproductive Issues Senior and Social Security Issues Technology and Communication Trade Issues Transportation Issues Veterans Issues Welfare and Poverty

Voting Record on Legislation Involving Federal, State, and Local Relations

(2010) S 3991 Allowing Collective Bargaining for Public Safety Officers

Outcome: Cloture Not Invoked (55/43)

Summary: -Defines "public safety officer" as any law enforcement officer, firefighter, or member of emergency medical services personnel who is not a permanent supervisory, management or confidential employee (Sec. 3). -Defines "confidential employee" as any individual employed by a public safety employer who is designated as confidential and who routinely assists supervisory and management employees in a confidential capacity (Sec. 3). -Requires the Federal Labor Relations Authority to determine whether or not a state (Sec. 4):

-Authorizes public safety officers to form and join a labor organization, which may exclude management employees, supervisory employees, and confidential employees; -Authorizes public safety officers to bargain over hours, wages, and the terms and conditions of employment; -Requires public safety employers to recognize and bargain with labor organizations, and to commit any resulting agreements to a written contract or memorandum of understanding; -Provides a method of dispute resolution, such as mediation or arbitration; and -Requires the enforcement of the above, either through a state administrative agency or through the state courts. -Requires the Federal Labor Relations Authority to consider the opinions of affected employers and labor organizations when determining whether or not state law is sufficient (Sec. 4). -Requires the Federal Labor Relations Authority to identify categories of public safety officers that are not covered by state law, in cases where state law is otherwise sufficient, and to enforce collective bargaining rights with regard to these categories of employees (Sec. 4). -Authorizes any person to challenge the determination of the Federal Labor Relations Authority by petitioning the United States Court of Appeals within 60 days of the date that the determination was made (Sec. 4). -Requires that if a State does not meet the responsibilities described by this Act the Federal Labor Relations Authority will begin to carry out these procedures on the latest of the following dates (Sec. 4):

-2 years after the date the bill was enacted into law; -The last day of the first regular session of the state legislature that begins after the bill was enacted into law; or -The last day of the first regular session of the state legislature that begins after the date that the Authority issued a determination made subsequent to a previously-made determination. -Requires the Federal Labor Relations Authority to carry out the following procedures in states that it determines fail to provide for the above (Sec. 5):

-Identify groups of employees that should be represented by a labor organization; -Conduct or supervise the election of a labor organization as the employee representative, and ensure that it has been selected by a voting majority of employees in each group; -Resolve issues relating to the duty to bargain in good faith; -Resolve complaints of unfair labor practices; -Resolve any exceptions to the awards of arbitrators; -Protect the ability of each employee to form, join, or assist a labor organization; and -Take any other actions deemed necessary and appropriate including, but not limited to, issuing subpoenas, examining witnesses, and taking depositions. -Authorizes the Federal Labor Relations Authority to petition the United States Court of Appeals to enforce the collective bargaining rights for public safety officers, and for any private individual to petition the court if the Authority has not already done so (Sec. 5). -Prohibits all employers, public safety officers, and labor organizations from striking or engaging in any other form of work stoppage that will disrupt the delivery of emergency services, as long as this prohibition does not preempt any related state or local law (Sec. 6). -Specifies that the bill will not invalidate any existing collective bargaining agreements (Sec. 7). -Prohibits the Federal Labor Relations Authority from applying its powers to any group of public safety officers who are deemed to already be sufficiently protected by state law (Sec. 8).

Hutchison's Vote

N

(2010) S Amdt 4051 Prohibiting Funding of State and Local Governments to Prevent Defaulting on Debt

Outcome: Amendment Rejected (47/50)

Summary: -Prohibits the Secretary of the Treasury from directly or indirectly using general fund revenues or funds borrowed pursuant to Title 31 of U.S. Code to purchase or guarantee any asset or obligation of (or to provide any other assistance to) any state, municipal, local, or county government that has defaulted on its obligations or is at risk of doing so without such assistance from the federal government (Sec. 5). -Prohibits the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System from directly or indirectly lending against, purchasing, or guaranteeing any asset or obligation of, or providing any other assistance to any state, municipal, local, or county government that has defaulted on its obligations or is at risk of doing so without such assistance from the federal government (Sec. 5).

Hutchison's Vote

Y

(2010) S Amdt 4034 Federal Preemption Over State Consumer Financial Laws

Outcome: Amendment Rejected (43/55)

Summary: -Repeals a requirement that the courts or the Comptroller of the Currency, before prescribing a regulation or order that federal law preempts a state consumer financial law, consult with the Director of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and determine that federal law provides a "substantial standard" which regulates the particular conduct, activity, or authority of a national bank that is subject to state consumer financial law (Sec. 1044).

Hutchison's Vote

Y

(2010) S Amdt 4071 Amending State Authority to Enforce Consumer Financial Regulations

Outcome: Amendment Adopted (80/18)

Summary: -Authorizes state attorney generals, or the equivalent thereof, to bring civil action against national banks or federal savings associations to enforce regulations established by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, provided that a copy of the complaint has been "timely" submitted to the Bureau and prudential regulator, if any, or the designee thereof (Sec. 1042). -Prohibits state attorney generals, or the equivalent thereof, from bringing civil action against a national bank or federal savings association for any act or omission that would be a violation of Title X of this Act (Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010) (Sec. 1042).

Hutchison's Vote

Y